The problem of leadership, in most African countries, is that of perception: the inability to distinguish between leadership and authority granted by power

Africa’s problem of leadership is that of perception and the inability to distinguish between leadership and authority granted by position, that’s, positional authority that comes from power. The common attitude by many people in power in Africa and hence cause of crisis in leadership, is to confuse authority for[with] leadership.

Most people in positions of power and authority aren’t necessarily leaders. They are often in such positions by either use of force and usurpation of power, or by way of selection or appointment by a higher power [authority], to whom they are beholden.

The process for selection [appointment] to such positions is more about the ability to serve the interests of the higher power that selects [appoints] them to such positions; and less about, if at all, demonstrable leadership abilities [credentials] of such individuals.

Such people in positions of power and authority simply have authority granted by their positions but lack any or have zero leadership abilities and/or skills. They are more the right-hand managers for the higher power than the leaders they falsely claim to be.

Their priority is catering to the interests and whims of the higher power that places them into such positions, and work to maintain that order. Nothing wrong with that in a patronage system in which favouritism, nepotism, ‘groupism‘, group-think, ā€œcliqueismā€ is the criteria.

This explains why there’s so much abuse of power and authority by people in positions of power and authority. They aren’t leaders but [institutional] process managers who, for the most part, lack basic organisational management skills. To say incompetent is not to exaggerate!

But they hide their incompetence behind the veil of power and authority and the fact that they are only responsible or accountable to a single power source and for that reason, they know how to manipulate and appease that power’s emotions to maintain their positions. Clever strategy!

Leadership is not “positional“; leadership has and knows no boundaries. It’s not selective, neither does or should it discriminate or favour one group interests against another group interests. One’s power and authority is in no way proof of one’s leadership abilities and skills.

Leadership is not coercive, it’s consensual, cooperative and seeks to bring everyone on board. It does not only encourage but can’t succeed without collective participation in all aspects necessary for it to succeed such as collective participation in the decision-making process.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s